Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Luxembourg: Beverages — Potassium supply — Value

Lao People's Democratic Republic
148 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Luxembourg
436 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
2nd
Luxembourg rank
3rd

Beverages — Potassium supply — Value over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Luxembourg
100200300400500600201020162023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 436 mg/cap/d against 148 mg/cap/d in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 288 mg/cap/d.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.9 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 2nd and Luxembourg ranks 3rd of 13 regions.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2010s 147.8 mg/cap/d 502 mg/cap/d 354.2 mg/cap/d Luxembourg
2020s 115.75 mg/cap/d 445.25 mg/cap/d 329.5 mg/cap/d Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beverages — potassium supply — value, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 436 mg/cap/d against 148 mg/cap/d in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in beverages — potassium supply — value between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Luxembourg?
288 mg/cap/d, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Luxembourg?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Luxembourg rank globally for beverages — potassium supply — value?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 2nd and Luxembourg ranks 3rd of 13 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beverages — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Luxembourg: Beverages — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beverages-potassium-supply-value/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beverages-potassium-supply-value/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/luxembourg/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Luxembourg: Beverages — Potassium supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beverages — Potassium supply — Value
Unit
mg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.