Kiribati vs Mauritania: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Kiribati
- Mauritania
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 85.1 g/cap/d against 84.5 g/cap/d in Mauritania, a difference of 0.6 g/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritania ahead.
Kiribati ranks 102nd and Mauritania ranks 103rd of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.41 g/cap/d | 79.13 g/cap/d | 6.72 g/cap/d | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 78.87 g/cap/d | 84.65 g/cap/d | 5.78 g/cap/d | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 85.2 g/cap/d | 84.7 g/cap/d | 0.5 g/cap/d | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Kiribati or Mauritania?
- Kiribati, at 85.1 g/cap/d against 84.5 g/cap/d in Mauritania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Kiribati and Mauritania?
- 0.6 g/cap/d, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mauritania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Kiribati and Mauritania rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Kiribati ranks 102nd and Mauritania ranks 103rd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.