French Polynesia vs Romania: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- French Polynesia
- Romania
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 112.4 g/cap/d against 111.7 g/cap/d in Romania, a difference of 0.7 g/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 34th and Romania ranks 35th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.41 g/cap/d | 106.71 g/cap/d | 7.3 g/cap/d | Romania |
| 2010s | 110.16 g/cap/d | 110 g/cap/d | 0.16 g/cap/d | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 112.6 g/cap/d | 111.25 g/cap/d | 1.35 g/cap/d | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, French Polynesia or Romania?
- French Polynesia, at 112.4 g/cap/d against 111.7 g/cap/d in Romania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between French Polynesia and Romania?
- 0.7 g/cap/d, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Romania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do French Polynesia and Romania rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- French Polynesia ranks 34th and Romania ranks 35th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.