Eastern Asia vs Serbia: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Eastern Asia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 134.3 g/cap/d against 127.7 g/cap/d in Eastern Asia, a difference of 6.6 g/cap/d.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Eastern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eastern Asia ahead.
Eastern Asia ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 4th of 37 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern Asia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.46 g/cap/d | 85.6 g/cap/d | 7.86 g/cap/d | Eastern Asia |
| 2010s | 114.97 g/cap/d | 120.73 g/cap/d | 5.76 g/cap/d | Serbia |
| 2020s | 126.2 g/cap/d | 133.45 g/cap/d | 7.25 g/cap/d | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Eastern Asia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 134.3 g/cap/d against 127.7 g/cap/d in Eastern Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Eastern Asia and Serbia?
- 6.6 g/cap/d, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Eastern Asia and Serbia rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Eastern Asia ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 4th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.