Central Asia vs Denmark: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Central Asia
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 126.4 g/cap/d against 101.5 g/cap/d in Central Asia, a difference of 24.9 g/cap/d.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Central Asia's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 8th and Denmark ranks 11th of 40 regions.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.34 g/cap/d | 108.45 g/cap/d | 30.11 g/cap/d | Denmark |
| 2010s | 93.73 g/cap/d | 120.81 g/cap/d | 27.08 g/cap/d | Denmark |
| 2020s | 100.55 g/cap/d | 126.6 g/cap/d | 26.05 g/cap/d | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Central Asia or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 126.4 g/cap/d against 101.5 g/cap/d in Central Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Central Asia and Denmark?
- 24.9 g/cap/d, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Denmark?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Central Asia and Denmark rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Central Asia ranks 8th and Denmark ranks 11th of 40 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.