Bermuda vs Japan: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Bermuda
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 88.9 g/cap/d against 88.4 g/cap/d in Bermuda, a difference of 0.5 g/cap/d.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 95th and Japan ranks 93rd of 166 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Bermuda or Japan?
- Japan, at 88.9 g/cap/d against 88.4 g/cap/d in Bermuda as of 2007.
- What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Bermuda and Japan?
- 0.5 g/cap/d, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Japan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Bermuda and Japan rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Bermuda ranks 95th and Japan ranks 93rd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.