Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Kazakhstan
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 121.2 g/cap/d against 121.1 g/cap/d in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.1 g/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 47th and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.03 g/cap/d | 115.35 g/cap/d | 12.32 g/cap/d | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 116.84 g/cap/d | 111 g/cap/d | 5.84 g/cap/d | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 122.05 g/cap/d | 119.75 g/cap/d | 2.3 g/cap/d | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Kazakhstan or New Caledonia?
- Kazakhstan, at 121.2 g/cap/d against 121.1 g/cap/d in New Caledonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?
- 0.1 g/cap/d, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and New Caledonia rank globally for average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 47th and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.