Eastern Asia vs Latvia: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Eastern Asia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 148.7 g/cap/d against 98.5 g/cap/d in Eastern Asia, a difference of 50.2 g/cap/d.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.5 times Eastern Asia's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 17th and Latvia ranks 18th of 37 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.97 g/cap/d | 117.41 g/cap/d | 34.44 g/cap/d | Latvia |
| 2010s | 87.37 g/cap/d | 128.61 g/cap/d | 41.24 g/cap/d | Latvia |
| 2020s | 96.8 g/cap/d | 147.7 g/cap/d | 50.9 g/cap/d | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Eastern Asia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 148.7 g/cap/d against 98.5 g/cap/d in Eastern Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Eastern Asia and Latvia?
- 50.2 g/cap/d, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Latvia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Eastern Asia and Latvia rank globally for average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Eastern Asia ranks 17th and Latvia ranks 18th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.