China, Taiwan Province of vs Kiribati: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value

China, Taiwan Province of
131.2 g/cap/d
in 2021
Kiribati
129.8 g/cap/d
in 2021
China, Taiwan Province of rank
34th
Kiribati rank
35th

Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Kiribati
050100150200020102021

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 131.2 g/cap/d against 129.8 g/cap/d in Kiribati, a difference of 1.4 g/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 34th and Kiribati ranks 35th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 129.35 g/cap/d 102.45 g/cap/d 26.9 g/cap/d China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 124.88 g/cap/d 127.36 g/cap/d 2.48 g/cap/d Kiribati
2020s 131.85 g/cap/d 128.55 g/cap/d 3.3 g/cap/d China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, China, Taiwan Province of or Kiribati?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 131.2 g/cap/d against 129.8 g/cap/d in Kiribati as of 2021.
What is the difference in average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between China, Taiwan Province of and Kiribati?
1.4 g/cap/d, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Kiribati?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Kiribati rank globally for average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 34th and Kiribati ranks 35th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Kiribati: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-fat-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/china-taiwan-province-of/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-fat-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/china-taiwan-province-of/kiribati/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Kiribati: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
g/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.