China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value

China, Hong Kong SAR
117.3 g/cap/d
in 2021
Saint Kitts and Nevis
117.7 g/cap/d
in 2021
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
52nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
51st

Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
050100150200020102021

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 117.7 g/cap/d against 117.3 g/cap/d in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.4 g/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 166 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 135.24 g/cap/d 83.18 g/cap/d 52.06 g/cap/d China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 125.65 g/cap/d 104.43 g/cap/d 21.22 g/cap/d China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 120.65 g/cap/d 116.65 g/cap/d 4 g/cap/d China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 117.7 g/cap/d against 117.3 g/cap/d in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2021.
What is the difference in average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.4 g/cap/d, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-fat-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/china-hong-kong-sar/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-fat-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/china-hong-kong-sar/st-kitts-and-nevis/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
g/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.