Mongolia vs Paraguay: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Mongolia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 131 % against 131 % in Paraguay, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Paraguay ahead.
Mongolia ranks 61st and Paraguay ranks 61st of 148 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98 % | 121.4 % | 23.4 % | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 116.4 % | 131.4 % | 15 % | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 132 % | 130.5 % | 1.5 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Mongolia or Paraguay?
- Mongolia, at 131 % against 131 % in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Mongolia and Paraguay?
- 0 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Paraguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Paraguay rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Mongolia ranks 61st and Paraguay ranks 61st of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.