Eswatini vs Jordan: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Eswatini
- Jordan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 111 % against 111 % in Jordan, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 121st and Jordan ranks 121st of 148 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 107 % | 121 % | 14 % | Jordan |
| 2010s | 103.4 % | 113.9 % | 10.5 % | Jordan |
| 2020s | 109.75 % | 108.25 % | 1.5 % | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Eswatini or Jordan?
- Eswatini, at 111 % against 111 % in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Eswatini and Jordan?
- 0 %, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Eswatini ranks 121st and Jordan ranks 121st of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.