Eastern Asia vs Romania: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Eastern Asia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 149 % against 139 % in Eastern Asia, a difference of 10 %.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Eastern Asia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 8th and Romania ranks 8th of 37 groups.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 118.8 % | 135.5 % | 16.7 % | Romania |
| 2010s | 130.2 % | 141.8 % | 11.6 % | Romania |
| 2020s | 138 % | 148.25 % | 10.25 % | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Eastern Asia or Romania?
- Romania, at 149 % against 139 % in Eastern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Eastern Asia and Romania?
- 10 %, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Romania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Asia and Romania rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Eastern Asia ranks 8th and Romania ranks 8th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.