Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Costa Rica
- Myanmar
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 123 % against 123 % in Myanmar, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 87th and Myanmar ranks 87th of 148 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 117 % | 101.7 % | 15.3 % | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 122.2 % | 119.4 % | 2.8 % | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 123.5 % | 122.5 % | 1 % | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Costa Rica or Myanmar?
- Costa Rica, at 123 % against 123 % in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Costa Rica and Myanmar?
- 0 %, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Myanmar?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Myanmar rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Costa Rica ranks 87th and Myanmar ranks 87th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.