Cameroon vs Mali: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Cameroon
- Mali
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 126 % against 126 % in Mali, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 76th and Mali ranks 76th of 148 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111 % | 119.5 % | 8.5 % | Mali |
| 2010s | 125.3 % | 127 % | 1.7 % | Mali |
| 2020s | 126 % | 126.25 % | 0.25 % | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Cameroon or Mali?
- Cameroon, at 126 % against 126 % in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Cameroon and Mali?
- 0 %, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Mali?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Mali rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Cameroon ranks 76th and Mali ranks 76th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.