Finland vs Syrian Arab Republic: Average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value

Finland
2,568 kcal/cap/d
in 2025
Syrian Arab Republic
2,386 kcal/cap/d
in 2025
Finland rank
5th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
7th

Average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value over time

  • Finland
  • Syrian Arab Republic
01.0k2.0k3.0k200020122025

How they compare

Finland currently reports 2,568 kcal/cap/d against 2,386 kcal/cap/d in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 182 kcal/cap/d.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 5th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 7th of 181 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 2,560 kcal/cap/d 2,267 kcal/cap/d 293.2 kcal/cap/d Finland
2010s 2,550 kcal/cap/d 2,281 kcal/cap/d 269.6 kcal/cap/d Finland
2020s 2,562 kcal/cap/d 2,369 kcal/cap/d 193.17 kcal/cap/d Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value, Finland or Syrian Arab Republic?
Finland, at 2,568 kcal/cap/d against 2,386 kcal/cap/d in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value between Finland and Syrian Arab Republic?
182 kcal/cap/d, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Syrian Arab Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Finland and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value?
Finland ranks 5th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 7th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Syrian Arab Republic: Average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-dietary-energy-requirement-kcal-cap-day-value/finland/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-dietary-energy-requirement-kcal-cap-day-value/finland/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Finland vs Syrian Arab Republic: Average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 6,185 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.