Libya vs Namibia: Aquatic Plants — Other uses
Aquatic Plants — Other uses over time
- Libya
- Namibia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 1000 t.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 44th of 155 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher aquatic plants — other uses, Libya or Namibia?
- Libya, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in aquatic plants — other uses between Libya and Namibia?
- 0 1000 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for aquatic plants — other uses?
- Libya ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 44th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Aquatic Plants — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.