Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: Apples and products — Processing

Australia and New Zealand
89 1000 t
in 2023
Central Asia
280 1000 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
18th
Central Asia rank
16th

Apples and products — Processing over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central Asia
0100200300201020162023

How they compare

Central Asia currently reports 280 1000 t against 89 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 191 1000 t.

That makes Central Asia's figure about 3.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Central Asia ranks 16th of 89 countries.

Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central Asia Difference Ahead
2010s 54.2 1000 t 241.9 1000 t 187.7 1000 t Central Asia
2020s 70.25 1000 t 292.5 1000 t 222.25 1000 t Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher apples and products — processing, Australia and New Zealand or Central Asia?
Central Asia, at 280 1000 t against 89 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in apples and products — processing between Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
191 1000 t, with Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia rank globally for apples and products — processing?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Central Asia ranks 16th of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Apples and products — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: Apples and products — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/apples-and-products-processing/australia-and-new-zealand/central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/apples-and-products-processing/australia-and-new-zealand/central-asia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: Apples and products — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Apples and products — Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
118 places, 1,564 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.