French Polynesia vs Lithuania: All food groups — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value

French Polynesia
1,091 μg/cap/d
in 2023
Lithuania
1,097 μg/cap/d
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
72nd
Lithuania rank
71st

All food groups — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Lithuania
05001.0k1.5k201020162023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 1,097 μg/cap/d against 1,091 μg/cap/d in French Polynesia, a difference of 6 μg/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lithuania ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 72nd and Lithuania ranks 71st of 163 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 1,138 μg/cap/d 1,202 μg/cap/d 64.3 μg/cap/d Lithuania
2020s 1,152 μg/cap/d 1,188 μg/cap/d 35.25 μg/cap/d Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all food groups — vitamin a supply (retinol equivalents) — value, French Polynesia or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 1,097 μg/cap/d against 1,091 μg/cap/d in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all food groups — vitamin a supply (retinol equivalents) — value between French Polynesia and Lithuania?
6 μg/cap/d, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Lithuania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Lithuania rank globally for all food groups — vitamin a supply (retinol equivalents) — value?
French Polynesia ranks 72nd and Lithuania ranks 71st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All food groups — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Lithuania: All food groups — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/all-food-groups-vitamin-a-supply-retinol-equivalents-value/french-polynesia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/all-food-groups-vitamin-a-supply-retinol-equivalents-value/french-polynesia/lithuania/">French Polynesia vs Lithuania: All food groups — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All food groups — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value
Unit
μg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.