Albania vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: All food groups — Magnesium supply — Value

Albania
539 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
313 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Albania rank
16th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
13th

All food groups — Magnesium supply — Value over time

  • Albania
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0200400600201020162023

How they compare

Albania currently reports 539 mg/cap/d against 313 mg/cap/d in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 226 mg/cap/d.

That makes Albania's figure about 1.7 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.

Albania ranks 16th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 13th of 163 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2010s 504.5 mg/cap/d 337.3 mg/cap/d 167.2 mg/cap/d Albania
2020s 528.25 mg/cap/d 317.75 mg/cap/d 210.5 mg/cap/d Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all food groups — magnesium supply — value, Albania or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Albania, at 539 mg/cap/d against 313 mg/cap/d in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all food groups — magnesium supply — value between Albania and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
226 mg/cap/d, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Albania and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for all food groups — magnesium supply — value?
Albania ranks 16th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 13th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All food groups — Magnesium supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: All food groups — Magnesium supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/all-food-groups-magnesium-supply-value/albania/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/all-food-groups-magnesium-supply-value/albania/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Albania vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: All food groups — Magnesium supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All food groups — Magnesium supply — Value
Unit
mg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.