Montenegro vs Vanuatu: Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses
Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses over time
- Montenegro
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 53 t against 51 t in Montenegro, a difference of 2 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 148th and Vanuatu ranks 147th of 158 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56 t | 66.75 t | 10.75 t | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 45.5 t | 76.75 t | 31.25 t | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher alcoholic beverages — other uses, Montenegro or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 53 t against 51 t in Montenegro as of 2013.
- What is the difference in alcoholic beverages — other uses between Montenegro and Vanuatu?
- 2 t, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Vanuatu?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Montenegro and Vanuatu rank globally for alcoholic beverages — other uses?
- Montenegro ranks 148th and Vanuatu ranks 147th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.