Mauritania vs Solomon Islands: Alcoholic Beverages β€” Import Quantity

Mauritania
125 t
in 2013
Solomon Islands
232 t
in 2013
Mauritania rank
171st
Solomon Islands rank
170th

Alcoholic Beverages β€” Import Quantity over time

  • Mauritania
  • Solomon Islands
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 232 t against 125 t in Mauritania, a difference of 107 t.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.9 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 591.33 t 565.89 t 25.44 t Mauritania
1970s 800.8 t 1,202 t 401.6 t Solomon Islands
1980s 335.5 t 2,347 t 2,012 t Solomon Islands
1990s 138.3 t 1,427 t 1,289 t Solomon Islands
2000s 271.7 t 649.4 t 377.7 t Solomon Islands
2010s 158.5 t 289.75 t 131.25 t Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher alcoholic beverages β€” import quantity, Mauritania or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 232 t against 125 t in Mauritania as of 2013.
What is the difference in alcoholic beverages β€” import quantity between Mauritania and Solomon Islands?
107 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Solomon Islands?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Mauritania and Solomon Islands rank globally for alcoholic beverages β€” import quantity?
Mauritania ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Alcoholic Beverages β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Solomon Islands: Alcoholic Beverages β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-import-quantity/mauritania/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-import-quantity/mauritania/solomon-islands/">Mauritania vs Solomon Islands: Alcoholic Beverages β€” Import Quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alcoholic Beverages β€” Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,338 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.