Ecuador vs Serbia and Montenegro: Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity

Ecuador
623,630 t
in 2013
Serbia and Montenegro
638,932 t
in 2005
Ecuador rank
55th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
54th

Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity over time

  • Ecuador
  • Serbia and Montenegro
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119872013

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 638,932 t against 623,630 t in Ecuador, a difference of 15,302 t.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 55th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 54th of 170 countries.

Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 175,148 t 790,643 t 615,496 t Serbia and Montenegro
2000s 218,186 t 741,762 t 523,576 t Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher alcoholic beverages — food supply quantity, Ecuador or Serbia and Montenegro?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 638,932 t against 623,630 t in Ecuador as of 2005.
What is the difference in alcoholic beverages — food supply quantity between Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
15,302 t, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
How do Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for alcoholic beverages — food supply quantity?
Ecuador ranks 55th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 54th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity (tonnes). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Serbia and Montenegro: Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-food-supply-quantity-tonnes/ecuador/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-food-supply-quantity-tonnes/ecuador/serbia-and-montenegro/">Ecuador vs Serbia and Montenegro: Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity (tonnes)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 10,285 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.