Armenia vs Gabon: Alcohol, Non-Food — Import Quantity
Alcohol, Non-Food — Import Quantity over time
- Armenia
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 527 t against 516 t in Armenia, a difference of 11 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Gabon ahead.
Armenia ranks 98th and Gabon ranks 97th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Gabon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 813.25 t | 160.12 t | 653.12 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 199.7 t | 218.2 t | 18.5 t | Gabon |
| 2010s | 662.5 t | 432 t | 230.5 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher alcohol, non-food — import quantity, Armenia or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 527 t against 516 t in Armenia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in alcohol, non-food — import quantity between Armenia and Gabon?
- 11 t, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Gabon?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Armenia and Gabon rank globally for alcohol, non-food — import quantity?
- Armenia ranks 98th and Gabon ranks 97th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Alcohol, Non-Food — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.