South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

South Africa
18,914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
19,444 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
108th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 19,444 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 18,914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 530 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 158 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6,795 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,582 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,214 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 8,442 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,091 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,350 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 9,754 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,635 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 119.52 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 10,535 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,737 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 798.25 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 16,038 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 12,569 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,469 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 18,752 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 18,304 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 448.3 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 19,444 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 18,914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
530 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.