Norway vs Saudi Arabia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Norway
9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
9,153 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
130th
Saudi Arabia rank
133rd

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Saudi Arabia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,153 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 528 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 130th and Saudi Arabia ranks 133rd of 158 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 8,757 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 612.66 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,145 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 9,171 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,110 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,061 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 10,330 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,252 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,079 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 9,773 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,638 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,135 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 9,736 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,819 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,917 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 10,106 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,476 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,630 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 10,310 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,382 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,928 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Norway or Saudi Arabia?
Norway, at 9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,153 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Norway and Saudi Arabia?
528 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Saudi Arabia rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 130th and Saudi Arabia ranks 133rd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Saudi Arabia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/norway/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/norway/saudi-arabia/">Norway vs Saudi Arabia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.