New Zealand vs Romania: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

New Zealand
60,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
60,274 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
59th
Romania rank
60th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Romania
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 60,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 60,274 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 522 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

New Zealand ranks 59th and Romania ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 24,986 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 50,685 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 25,699 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Romania
1970s 29,140 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 70,641 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 41,501 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 34,847 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 87,555 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 52,707 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 39,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 71,539 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 31,743 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 48,283 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 69,509 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 21,226 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 57,099 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 72,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 15,582 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Romania
2020s 61,300 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 62,494 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,194 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Romania?
New Zealand, at 60,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 60,274 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Romania?
522 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Romania rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 59th and Romania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Romania: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/romania/">New Zealand vs Romania: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.