Namibia vs Suriname: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Namibia
420.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
157th
Suriname rank
155th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 420.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 675.31 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 2.6 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 155th of 158 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 182.98 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 616.76 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 433.78 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 206.75 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 789.05 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 582.3 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 224.5 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,189 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 964.52 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 259.27 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,221 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 961.87 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 343.99 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 751.54 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 375.17 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,459 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,084 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 403.52 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,224 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 820.19 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Namibia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 420.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Namibia and Suriname?
675.31 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 155th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Suriname: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/">Namibia vs Suriname: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.