Morocco vs East Timor: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Morocco
27,930 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
29,178 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
97th
East Timor rank
96th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Morocco
  • East Timor
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 29,178 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 27,930 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 1,248 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

Morocco ranks 97th and East Timor ranks 96th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 7,462 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,353 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,891 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre East Timor
1970s 9,434 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 11,954 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,520 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre East Timor
1980s 12,422 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 15,290 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,867 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre East Timor
1990s 16,345 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 25,213 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,867 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 20,732 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 27,421 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,689 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 29,465 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 29,660 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 195.21 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 30,042 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 26,182 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,860 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Morocco or East Timor?
East Timor, at 29,178 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 27,930 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Morocco and East Timor?
1,248 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and East Timor rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Morocco ranks 97th and East Timor ranks 96th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs East Timor: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/morocco/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/morocco/timor-leste/">Morocco vs East Timor: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.