Mexico vs Tunisia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Mexico
30,646 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
32,384 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
91st
Tunisia rank
89th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Tunisia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 32,384 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 30,646 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 1,738 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Mexico ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 89th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 6,444 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,941 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 497.73 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 9,304 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,039 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 735.79 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 13,133 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 12,837 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 295.42 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 15,566 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 18,751 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,185 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 20,297 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 23,131 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,834 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 25,189 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 29,523 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,333 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 29,624 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 33,813 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,189 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Mexico or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 32,384 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 30,646 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Mexico and Tunisia?
1,738 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Tunisia rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 89th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Tunisia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/mexico/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/mexico/tunisia/">Mexico vs Tunisia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.