Maldives vs Tanzania: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Maldives
11,094 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
11,377 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
125th
Tanzania rank
123rd

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Maldives
  • Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 11,377 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 11,094 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 283 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.

Maldives ranks 125th and Tanzania ranks 123rd of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 24,561 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,444 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 23,117 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1970s 24,990 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,112 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 22,878 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 42,397 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,279 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 39,118 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 59,186 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,676 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 55,509 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 90,077 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,283 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 84,794 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 21,307 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,143 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 12,164 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 10,574 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,943 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 368.92 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Maldives or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 11,377 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 11,094 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Maldives and Tanzania?
283 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Tanzania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Tanzania rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Maldives ranks 125th and Tanzania ranks 123rd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Tanzania: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/maldives/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/maldives/tanzania/">Maldives vs Tanzania: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.