Japan vs Malta: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Japan
245,268 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
268,447 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
12th
Malta rank
9th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • Malta
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 268,447 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 245,268 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 23,179 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 12th and Malta ranks 9th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 274,640 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 256,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 17,844 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 292,167 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 329,366 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 37,199 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 303,220 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 381,335 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 78,116 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 295,180 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 494,695 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 199,515 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 268,146 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 478,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 210,661 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 254,153 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 394,755 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 140,602 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 248,329 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 276,271 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 27,942 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Japan or Malta?
Malta, at 268,447 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 245,268 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Japan and Malta?
23,179 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Malta rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 12th and Malta ranks 9th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Malta: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/japan/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/japan/malta/">Japan vs Malta: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.