Ireland vs Malawi: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Ireland
122,104 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
127,676 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
29th
Malawi rank
26th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Ireland
  • Malawi
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 127,676 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 122,104 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 5,572 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 26th of 158 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 50,312 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,058 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 42,253 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 67,057 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 12,578 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 54,479 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 83,332 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 14,887 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 68,445 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 100,309 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 23,469 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 76,840 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 97,389 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 44,241 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 53,148 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 106,841 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 88,233 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 18,608 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 125,036 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 123,776 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,259 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Ireland or Malawi?
Malawi, at 127,676 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 122,104 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Ireland and Malawi?
5,572 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Malawi rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Ireland ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 26th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Malawi: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/ireland/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/ireland/malawi/">Ireland vs Malawi: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.