Hong Kong vs Israel: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Hong Kong
368,351 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
365,760 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
3rd
Israel rank
4th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Israel
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 368,351 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 365,760 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 2,591 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 3rd and Israel ranks 4th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 4 and Israel in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 409,457 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 111,084 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 298,373 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 527,755 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 177,313 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 350,442 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 585,107 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 216,998 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 368,110 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 205,887 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 246,039 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 40,152 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Israel
2000s 242,611 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 302,790 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 60,180 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Israel
2010s 273,897 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 339,472 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 65,576 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Israel
2020s 451,695 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 355,411 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 96,284 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Israel?
Hong Kong, at 368,351 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 365,760 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Israel?
2,591 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Israel rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 3rd and Israel ranks 4th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Israel: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/israel/">Hong Kong vs Israel: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.