Finland vs Norway: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Finland
9,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
129th
Norway rank
130th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • Norway
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 9,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 126 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 129th and Norway ranks 130th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 9,884 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,757 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,127 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1970s 10,374 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,171 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,203 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 11,000 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,330 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 669.31 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 10,302 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,773 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 529.39 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 10,623 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,736 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 886.63 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 10,448 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,106 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 341.48 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 10,182 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,310 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 127.97 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Finland or Norway?
Finland, at 9,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Finland and Norway?
126 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Norway rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 129th and Norway ranks 130th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Norway: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/finland/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/finland/norway/">Finland vs Norway: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.