Ecuador vs Egypt: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Ecuador
35,690 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
33,594 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
84th
Egypt rank
87th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 35,690 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 33,594 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 2,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 84th and Egypt ranks 87th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Egypt in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 9,117 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,470 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,647 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 10,185 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,151 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,033 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 11,598 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 11,469 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 128.73 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 18,052 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 17,885 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 167.42 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 24,555 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 25,515 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 960.53 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 31,103 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 29,422 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,682 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 33,816 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 32,629 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,187 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Egypt?
Ecuador, at 35,690 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 33,594 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Egypt?
2,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Egypt rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 84th and Egypt ranks 87th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Egypt: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/egypt-arab-rep/">Ecuador vs Egypt: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.