Congo vs Norway: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Congo
10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
127th
Norway rank
130th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Norway
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 838 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Congo ranks 127th and Norway ranks 130th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 3,210 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,757 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,548 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 3,513 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,171 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,658 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 4,392 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,330 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,939 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 4,818 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,773 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,955 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 6,748 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,736 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,989 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 9,562 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,106 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 544.43 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 10,421 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,310 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 111.87 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Congo or Norway?
Congo, at 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,681 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Congo and Norway?
838 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Norway rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 127th and Norway ranks 130th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Norway: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/norway/">Congo vs Norway: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.