Congo vs Maldives: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Congo
10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
11,094 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
127th
Maldives rank
125th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Maldives
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 11,094 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 575 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.

Congo ranks 127th and Maldives ranks 125th of 158 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 3,210 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 24,561 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 21,352 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1970s 3,513 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 24,990 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 21,477 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 4,392 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 42,397 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 38,005 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 4,614 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 59,186 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 54,571 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 6,748 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 90,077 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 83,329 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 9,562 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 21,307 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 11,746 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 10,421 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,574 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 152.93 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Congo or Maldives?
Maldives, at 11,094 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Congo and Maldives?
575 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Maldives?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Maldives rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 127th and Maldives ranks 125th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Maldives: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/maldives/">Congo vs Maldives: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.