Congo vs Guinea: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Congo
10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea
11,138 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
127th
Guinea rank
124th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Guinea
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 11,138 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 619 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 127th and Guinea ranks 124th of 158 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 3,210 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,710 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,500 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 3,513 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,934 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,579 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 4,392 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,238 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,153 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 4,818 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,294 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,524 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 6,748 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,740 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,008 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 9,562 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,443 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,119 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 10,421 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,089 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 332.8 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Congo or Guinea?
Guinea, at 11,138 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Congo and Guinea?
619 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Guinea rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 127th and Guinea ranks 124th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guinea: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea/">Congo vs Guinea: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.