Congo vs Finland: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Congo
10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
9,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
127th
Finland rank
129th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Finland
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 712 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Congo ranks 127th and Finland ranks 129th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 3,210 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,884 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,675 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1970s 3,513 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,374 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,861 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 4,392 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 11,000 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,608 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 4,818 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,302 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,485 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 6,748 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,623 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,875 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 9,562 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,448 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 885.91 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 10,421 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,182 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 239.84 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Congo or Finland?
Congo, at 10,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 9,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Congo and Finland?
712 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Finland rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 127th and Finland ranks 129th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Finland: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/finland/">Congo vs Finland: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.