China vs Rwanda: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

China
152,170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
164,964 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
21st
Rwanda rank
19th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 164,964 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 152,170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 12,794 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

China ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 19th of 158 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 18,956 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 53,927 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 34,971 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 26,244 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 77,953 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 51,710 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 40,175 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 103,532 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 63,357 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 66,882 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 101,032 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 34,151 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 98,938 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 136,173 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 37,235 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 131,144 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 158,808 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 27,665 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 146,623 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 162,438 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 15,814 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 164,964 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 152,170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between China and Rwanda?
12,794 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
China ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 19th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.