China vs India: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

China
152,170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
162,194 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
21st
India rank
20th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • India
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 162,194 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 152,170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 10,024 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

China ranks 21st and India ranks 20th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and India in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China India Difference Ahead
1960s 18,956 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 28,342 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,386 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 26,244 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 35,834 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,590 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre India
1980s 40,175 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 48,518 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,343 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre India
1990s 66,882 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 66,335 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 546.94 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 98,938 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 83,906 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 15,033 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 131,144 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 120,786 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,357 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 146,623 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 153,922 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,298 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, China or India?
India, at 162,194 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 152,170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between China and India?
10,024 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and India rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
China ranks 21st and India ranks 20th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs India: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/china/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/china/india/">China vs India: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.