Chile vs Nicaragua: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Chile
21,037 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
22,308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
106th
Nicaragua rank
104th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Nicaragua
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 22,308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 21,037 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1,271 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 106th and Nicaragua ranks 104th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 6,102 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,386 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 715.62 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 6,921 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,036 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,115 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 8,674 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,868 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 12,925 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,405 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,519 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 17,185 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 12,353 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,832 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 19,990 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 18,167 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,823 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 21,008 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 22,805 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,797 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Chile or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 22,308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 21,037 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Chile and Nicaragua?
1,271 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Nicaragua rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 106th and Nicaragua ranks 104th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nicaragua: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/chile/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/chile/nicaragua/">Chile vs Nicaragua: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.