Chad vs Madagascar: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Chad
4,351 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
5,134 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
148th
Madagascar rank
146th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Madagascar
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 5,134 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 4,351 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 783 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.2 times Chad's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 148th and Madagascar ranks 146th of 158 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 866.03 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,398 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,532 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 889.91 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,162 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,272 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 1,090 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,820 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,730 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 1,600 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,314 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,714 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 2,195 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,799 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,604 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 3,570 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,581 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,012 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 4,238 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,861 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 623.46 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Chad or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 5,134 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 4,351 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Chad and Madagascar?
783 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Madagascar?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Madagascar rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 148th and Madagascar ranks 146th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Madagascar: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/chad/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/chad/madagascar/">Chad vs Madagascar: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.