Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Cambodia
62,038 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
60,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
58th
New Zealand rank
59th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Cambodia
  • New Zealand
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 62,038 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 60,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 1,242 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Cambodia ranks 58th and New Zealand ranks 59th of 158 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 15,810 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 24,986 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,176 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 12,082 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 29,140 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 17,058 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 11,851 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 34,847 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 22,997 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 16,671 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 39,064 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 22,393 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 25,475 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 48,283 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 22,808 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 52,921 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 57,099 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,179 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 59,025 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 61,300 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,275 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Cambodia or New Zealand?
Cambodia, at 62,038 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 60,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Cambodia and New Zealand?
1,242 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and New Zealand rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Cambodia ranks 58th and New Zealand ranks 59th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/new-zealand/">Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.