Burundi vs Sri Lanka: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Burundi
101,801 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
100,683 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
37th
Sri Lanka rank
39th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Sri Lanka
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 101,801 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 100,683 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1,118 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 37th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 35,272 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 34,091 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,181 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 40,687 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 42,144 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,458 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 48,342 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 51,751 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,409 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 53,600 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 60,509 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,909 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 56,776 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 67,235 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,460 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 80,474 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 90,192 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,717 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 103,010 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 104,565 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,555 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Burundi or Sri Lanka?
Burundi, at 101,801 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 100,683 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Burundi and Sri Lanka?
1,118 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Sri Lanka rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 37th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Sri Lanka: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/burundi/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/burundi/sri-lanka/">Burundi vs Sri Lanka: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.