Brazil vs Nicaragua: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Brazil
25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
22,308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
101st
Nicaragua rank
104th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Nicaragua
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 22,308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 3,023 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Brazil ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 104th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 3,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,386 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,706 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 4,950 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,036 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,086 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 7,219 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 412.36 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 9,292 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,405 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,886 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 13,628 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 12,353 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,276 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 19,390 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 18,167 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,223 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 23,314 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 22,805 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 508.92 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Brazil or Nicaragua?
Brazil, at 25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 22,308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Brazil and Nicaragua?
3,023 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Nicaragua rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 104th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Nicaragua: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/brazil/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/brazil/nicaragua/">Brazil vs Nicaragua: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.