Brazil vs Colombia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Brazil
25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia
25,501 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
101st
Colombia rank
100th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Colombia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 25,501 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 101st and Colombia ranks 100th of 158 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Colombia Difference Ahead
1960s 3,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,244 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,564 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
1970s 4,950 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,779 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,829 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 7,219 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 11,434 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,215 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 9,292 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 14,391 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,099 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 13,628 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 16,903 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,275 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 19,390 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 21,393 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,003 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 23,314 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 24,792 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,478 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Brazil or Colombia?
Colombia, at 25,501 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Brazil and Colombia?
170 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Colombia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Colombia rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 101st and Colombia ranks 100th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Colombia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/brazil/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/brazil/colombia/">Brazil vs Colombia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.