Brazil vs Cameroon: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Brazil
25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon
23,483 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
101st
Cameroon rank
103rd

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Cameroon
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 23,483 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 1,848 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Brazil ranks 101st and Cameroon ranks 103rd of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Cameroon in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Cameroon Difference Ahead
1960s 3,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,877 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 196.8 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1970s 4,950 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,173 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 222.75 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 7,219 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,583 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,636 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 9,292 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,427 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,864 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 13,628 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 11,731 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,897 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 19,390 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 20,113 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 722.97 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 23,314 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 22,810 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 504.2 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Brazil or Cameroon?
Brazil, at 25,331 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 23,483 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Brazil and Cameroon?
1,848 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Cameroon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Cameroon rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 101st and Cameroon ranks 103rd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Cameroon: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/brazil/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/brazil/cameroon/">Brazil vs Cameroon: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.