Botswana vs Suriname: Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Botswana
73.74 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
158th
Suriname rank
155th
Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time
- Botswana
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 73.74 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 1,022 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Suriname's figure about 14.9 times Botswana's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 155th of 158 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 71.33 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 616.76 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 545.43 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1970s | 102.11 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 789.05 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 686.94 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1980s | 92.29 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,189 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,097 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1990s | 50.3 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,221 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,171 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2000s | 40.62 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,055 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2010s | 52.61 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,459 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,407 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2020s | 134.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,224 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | 1,089 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Botswana or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1,096 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 73.74 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Botswana and Suriname?
- 1,022 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
- Botswana ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 155th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.